Gravastar is an unconventional idea that is as
interesting as it is odd. This hypothesis was originally put forward by Mazur
and Mottola in 2004. Gravastar literally means "Gravitational Vacuum Condensate
Star," which is (in theory) an extension of the Bose-Einstein Condensate and put
forward as a part of gravitational systems. Ultimately, it is meant to stand as
an alternative to black holes.
One of the benefits of the Gravastar over that if
an ordinary black hole is that of entropy, the current accepted models of
black holes have them having a very large entropy value. Gravastars, on the
other hand, have quite a low entropy.
The theory goes that, as a star collapses further
[past the point of neutron degeneracy] the particles fall into a Bose-Einstein
state where the entire star [all of the collapsing material] nears absolute
zero and is able to get very compact. As a result, it acts as a giant atom
composed of bosons.
The interior of these Gravastars is thought that it
might be within a de Sitter Spacetime, which means that it has a positive
vacuum energy which could give rise to an internal negative pressure.
We often cling to the tried and true. And this
isn't a recent trend; it is the way that we've been all through human history.
For example, for many years, we believed that the Earth was flat and that one
could eventually fall off of the globe. We also believed that the Earth was
the center of the universe (some people still do).
And several ancient civilizations even used to use
mercury as a medicine. Fortunately, we tested these ideas and came up with
better ones.
Most of the math that goes into explaining this new
model for a black hole is extremely complex and would require several pages of
notes (the linked text can be used to see this information).
For the time being, it suffices to say that this
theoretical model consists of 5 different layers that construct the Gravastar,
with de sitter spacetime effectively creating the negative pressure that keeps
the Gravastar from collapsing along with some other mathematical constructs.
Instead of using the Einstein field equations to
calculate the event horizon of a black hole, Mazur & Mottola put forward
that the event horizon (as we know it) is actually the outer shell of the
Bose-Einstein matter (this isn't any more dramatic than Stephen Hawking's
latest claim), anything that comes in contact with it becomes a part of
it--similar to matter hitting a neutron star and being broken down into
neutrons due to the environment.
Over the past few years this model has been
getting more and more attention as a contender of the current black hole
model; however, it still only has a small "following" in the grand scheme of
things. As I previously mentioned, this isn't a theory that I personally like
as a replacement of the standard black hole theory, but if we are to learn
anything from our mistakes all throughout history when it comes to science, we
really do need to keep an open mind.
Comments
Post a Comment